What’s So Bad About Google
The Autocat regulars have picked up the Guardian article on OCLC last week, and the direction they’ve gone with the conversation seems a little….oh what’s the word…wrong? Complaints immediately sprang up regarding the anti-OCLC agenda held by those who were interviewed (why this is surprising, or a problem I don’t get). And people responded even more vehemently against the suggestion that it’s wrong for catalog records to be part of the hidden web.
The arguement goes something like this, people can search for a book in either a library’s own catalog or in Worldcat, so why would you want to let Google do it? Well let’s see, because people use Google and they don’t use Worldcat (the majority of patrons have probably never even heard of it). Because Google is intuitive to use and our catalogs are anything but. Because we have to meet the patrons at their level and not force them to come up to ours.
Furthermore, there’s a bit of a fear that giving search engines access to our data will make our own systems irrelevant. That’s only true in that our systems are already bordering on decrepitude. Our jobs are to find ways to let people discover our resources. To do so we should use every single tool at our disposal. There is no possible downside if a new patron finds our stuff that wouldn’t have otherwise. Really who cares if this discovery happened through an approved channel or not? The important thing is that it was able to occur.