I’m back for a second day of conference blogging fun. Once again I’ll be posting updates here throughout the day.
Posted tagged ‘Librarything’
There’s nothing I could say today that could possible top this bit from Tim Spalding today:
Somehow institutions dedicated to the idea that knowledge should be freely available to all have come to the conclusion that knowledge about knowledge—book data—should not, and traditional library mottos like Boston‘s “Free to All” and Philadelphia‘s Liber Libere Omnibus (“Free books for all!”) given way to:
“No part of any Data provided in any form by WorldCat may be used, disclosed, reproduced, transferred or transmitted in any form without the prior written consent of OCLC except as expressly permitted hereunder.”
You can (and should) read the rest of the post here, it’s equally brilliant.
I’m not really here right now, but still had to post the ARL’s official critique of the OCLC records use policy. As Tim Spalding comments, it’s really good and it shows that there are some major research institutions willing to come out against OCLC.
The networking powers of web 2.0 don’t get talked about nearly as often as many of the techonology’s other benefits to the library world, but that’s definitely my favorite part. Without I never would have started talking to my newfound Twitter friend @neiljohnford, who I met on a forum in Librarything, and convinced to join Twitter (much to his regret).
Now he’s got a very nice post up about his experience with his first month using the service, with a focus on the professional pros and cons.
On a seperate note, I’m going out of town for a few days so I’ll probably be a few posts short here. Back next week.
I really hate coming back to work after a holiday weekend. The day’s over and I still feel jetlagged. And it didn’t help that today proved to be pretty eventful.
I got to start by running my first workshop on LibraryThing, which I loved. I managed to get a nice mix of staff and patrons for it who seemed to be pretty engaged by the material. I particularly like that the group really did seem to grasp the site’s potential, I even got to go off on a tangent on the OSC project.
Then while cleaning up the consortia’s server died. Meanwhile, we were swamped with an extra day’s worth of patrons and deliveries. Oh and pretty sizeably number of our desk staff were out sick. And to top it off we had a planning committee meeting scheduled too.
Tomorrow, another meeting. God I’m tired.
I realize this site is rapidly decending into being nothing more than Tim Spalding fan service, but I can’t help it if the man’s opinions tend to mirror my own. His latest blog post is a bit on libraries, social networks, and homophily. The post is in direct response to a Guardian article.
The relevant bit is that library catalogs can contribute to this problem, and I’m going to extend that to the physical layout of our collections as well. Very few patrons like to browse anymore. By and large people expect to be able to come in, find the one book/subject they’re interested in, grab the relevant title and walk out. To use Tim’s word, this system removes serendipity from the process.
Our catalog is designed to cater this behavior, and there are plenty of librarians out there taking the next step. This is one of the reasons special collections can tick me off. There are certainly reasons why a few of them (local interest) can be a good idea, but much of the time it just limits browsing further and ensures that some of your mid-list titles (or those that defy easy catagorization) will never be discovered.